What's the catch? In a move that has sparked political intrigue and speculation across Eastern Visayas, two congressmen from Samar – 1st District Representative Stephen James Tan and 2nd District Representative Reynolds Michael Tan – made a rare and deliberate choice: they abstained from voting for the re-election of Leyte 1st District Representative Martin Romualdez as Speaker of the House during the opening session of the 20th Congress.
Romualdez, a close ally of the Marcos family and now a returning House Speaker, was re-elected with overwhelming support from the majority bloc.
Alongside his appointment, presidential son and Ilocos Norte 1st District Representative Sandro Marcos was elected Majority Floor Leader – a move viewed by many as cementing the Marcos-Romualdez political dynasty's stronghold in the House of Representatives.
In a chamber known for bloc-voting and political conformity, the Tans’ decision to abstain stands out—not just for its rarity, but for its layered implications.
Not Opposition, But Not Support
Unlike dissenters who openly vote against majority-backed candidates, abstention is a gray area—neither a challenge nor a pledge of allegiance.
The fact that the Tans did not align with either the opposition or the ruling bloc hints at a calculated stance.
Their decision is not merely a political footnote; it is a silent message that invites closer scrutiny.
Some political analysts argue that the abstention was symbolic—a form of "disciplined neutrality."
Others interpret it as quiet resistance or a protective maneuver amid a Congress increasingly seen as centralized under a dominant leadership.
“This could be a subtle act of distancing,” a political observer from Eastern Visayas noted. “In a supermajority where decisions are often made by consensus or pressure, abstaining could be the only remaining space for autonomy.”
Political Risks and Local Implications
The choice is not without risk. In a Congress where committee chairmanships, budget allocations, and development project approvals often depend on party loyalty and cooperation with the leadership, stepping away from the fold may carry consequences.
Yet the Tans may be betting on their strong local political machinery. Both belong to the influential Tan political clan, which has held power in Samar for decades.
Their abstention could be interpreted as a local show of independence—an assertion that Samar’s political direction is not wholly dictated by national alliances.
Moreover, with Eastern Visayas still grappling with underdevelopment, poverty, and infrastructure gaps, constituents are watching to see whether this political stance will help—or hinder—the delivery of badly needed services.
A Window into the Future
The 20th Congress is only beginning, but this early divergence offers a glimpse of potential fractures in the seemingly united lower house.
Will the Tans’ abstention inspire other representatives to assert independent positions? Or will the weight of political consequence push them back into conformity?
Their future legislative behavior—especially on national policies that affect Eastern Visayas—will likely reveal whether this move was a one-time signal or the start of a more assertive, regionally grounded political stance.
For now, the silence of their abstention speaks volumes. Whether it is strategic defiance or a hedged bet, one thing is certain: in a political arena often marked by loud alliances and louder defections, the quiet acts can be the most telling.
#WeTakeAStand #OpinYon #OpinYonCoverStory