A Decade of Lessons

When Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) struck Eastern Visayas in November 2013, it exposed the region’s painful unpreparedness for a disaster of such magnitude.

The storm surge, which claimed thousands of lives and flattened communities, revealed gaps in early warning systems, coordination among local government units (LGUs), and public awareness.

Communication lines failed, evacuation centers were inadequate, and many residents underestimated the storm’s threat due to a lack of understanding of terms like “storm surge.”

Fast forward to the arrival of Typhoon Tino several years later, and the contrast in preparedness was notable.

Though Tino was less destructive than Yolanda, the response of LGUs demonstrated how far the region had come in disaster readiness.

Early warnings were disseminated promptly through radio, text alerts, and social media.

Local disaster risk reduction and management offices (DRRMOs) were better equipped, with prepositioned relief goods and clearer evacuation plans.

Communities were more proactive, evacuating even before conditions worsened.

These improvements did not happen overnight.

The trauma of Yolanda pushed LGUs to institutionalize disaster preparedness, invest in capacity building, and strengthen coordination with national agencies and NGOs.

Evacuation drills became more regular, and disaster education reached even the smallest barangays.

However, challenges remain. Many LGUs still grapple with limited funds for infrastructure resilience, and some coastal areas remain vulnerable to flooding and storm surges.

Preparedness levels also vary between provinces, with poorer municipalities lagging behind.

Typhoon Tino proved that Eastern Visayas has learned critical lessons from Yolanda, showing resilience and vigilance born from tragedy.

Yet, true preparedness is a continuous process.

One that demands sustained investment, stronger community participation, and the unwavering commitment of leaders to protect lives above all else.

The storm surge, which claimed thousands of lives and flattened communities, revealed gaps in early warning systems, coordination among local government units (LGUs), and public awareness.

Communication lines failed, evacuation centers were inadequate, and many residents underestimated the storm’s threat due to a lack of understanding of terms like “storm surge.”

Fast forward to the arrival of Typhoon Tino several years later, and the contrast in preparedness was notable.

Though Tino was less destructive than Yolanda, the response of LGUs demonstrated how far the region had come in disaster readiness.

Early warnings were disseminated promptly through radio, text alerts, and social media.

Local disaster risk reduction and management offices (DRRMOs) were better equipped, with prepositioned relief goods and clearer evacuation plans.

Communities were more proactive, evacuating even before conditions worsened.

These improvements did not happen overnight.

The trauma of Yolanda pushed LGUs to institutionalize disaster preparedness, invest in capacity building, and strengthen coordination with national agencies and NGOs.

Evacuation drills became more regular, and disaster education reached even the smallest barangays.

However, challenges remain. Many LGUs still grapple with limited funds for infrastructure resilience, and some coastal areas remain vulnerable to flooding and storm surges.

Preparedness levels also vary between provinces, with poorer municipalities lagging behind.

Typhoon Tino proved that Eastern Visayas has learned critical lessons from Yolanda, showing resilience and vigilance born from tragedy.

Yet, true preparedness is a continuous process.

One that demands sustained investment, stronger community participation, and the unwavering commitment of leaders to protect lives above all else.

#WeTakeAStand #OpinYon #OpinYonNews #Editorial